Following on from the High Court hearing regarding Fallon’s Public House yesterday, a communique has emanated from Charlie Allen and the Trust, this communique is in the form of an email and therefore private but, as at least one of the recipients has now made it public I am free to comment.
In this communique Mr Allen states that ” It is obvious we were denied proper access to the Courts”, this absolutely false, the Trust was given the opportunity to show up at the Court yesterday just the same as the many people from all corners of the country did.
It goes on to complain that the trust was given only one day to prepare a “defending affidavit” ( the term you are looking for is a “replying affidavit”), again this is an excuse, if the Trust had serious objections to the limited time, it could have ventilated those concerns to the Court and the probability is that the Court would have allowed time for the replying affidavit in the interests of due process, as it had already done when it denied the application on Monday last on an ex parte basis.
Mr Allen then goes on to state that people can “be assured we are appealing to the Supreme Court“, what exactly, Mr Allen are you appealing to the Supreme Court, you and the Trust, because neither of you are parties to the proceedings that were before the Court yesterday so, you have no standing to appeal anything to the Supreme Court.
If you are intimating that the Family, (the beneficiaries) will appeal to the Supreme Court, you are grossly mistaken, no leave was granted to appeal and no appeal is possible on any point of Law relating to the decision of the Court yesterday.
Stop misleading people.
This communique closes by stating that people are trying to break confidence in the Trust and this is some indication of how serious a threat the Trust is perceived to be.
That statement is ludicrous, the Trust has been marketed by Mr Allen and his colleagues as a silver bullet, I have listened to him in person on a number of occasions when he stated absolutely that:
1) Receivers are removed within a short period of 3 to 6 weeks.
2) The Trust’s legal team represent the members in all Court action.
The Trust and Mr Allen have failed miserably on the basis of yesterdays proceedings, as each day passes my worst fears and suspicions are being realized and my heart goes out to all the ordinary Irish people who have place their blind faith in a very convincing and affable representative of the Rudolphus Allen Trust.
I no longer believe that there are three Barristers behind the Trust, this is evident in my mind by the attitude and language used by Mr Allen in his communiques and obvious absence from Court hearings.
I am as always, open to proven wrong and I invite Mr Allen or any of his representatives to engage and prove me wrong, step up and carry through your promises to the many people you have harvested.
Show at least one case which you have been successful in, none of the cases in which you claim to have removed Receivers from have had the Receivers removed by the Trust or in fact at all, and your claims to the contrary are false and misleading.
I am aware of other members of the public whom some representatives of this Trust/organisation have attempted to intimidate and threaten when they questioned the scheme, I have experienced very disturbing reactions to questions personally and this type of response to scrutiny will invariably lead this author and many other people to arrive at conclusions which will not be kind to Mr Allen or his Trust.